Home  |  News  |  Sitemap  |  Contact Us  |  Login
Advertise With Us
Latest Notification
  • banner1
  • banner2
  • banner3
  • banner4
  • banner5
  • banner6
  • banner7
banner11 banner22 banner33 banner44 banner45 banner46 banner47

 Case Digest


Back
Drugs and Cosmetics Act, 1940
Section 18 (a) (i), 27 (d)—Prima facie allegations showed that the Directors (accused No. 2 to 8 ) of the accused No. 1 -Company were also responsible for the manufacture of the drug
Section 18 (a) (i), 27 (d)—Prima facie allegations showed that the Directors (accused No. 2 to 8 ) of the accused No. 1 -Company were also responsible for the manufacture of the drug
Offence under - the order of the Id. Magistrate taking cognizance and issuance of summons against the petitioners—in challenge—the High Court held that prima facie allegations showed that the Directors (accused No. 2 to 8 ) of the accused No. 1 -Company were also responsible for the manufacture of the drug, which is prohibited and which constituted an offence—no interference in the impugned proceedings—petition dismissed.
M/s Ozone Pharmaceuticals Ltd & others vs. State, Karnataka High Court, 2012 (2) Drugs Cases (DC) 129

Back


» Home
» Latest Notification
» New Drugs
» Import of Drugs
» Drug Prices
» Legislations
» Applications Forms
» Quackwatch
» Forms & Fees
» Licence Conditions
» Schedules
» Health, Pharma. Policies & Reports
» Ayurvedic
» Govt. Bodies
» Information Centre
» Directory
» Alert
» Regulatory News
» Research News
» News in Hindi
» Login
» Contact Us

Copyright © DrugsControl.org - Jaipur, INDIA. All Rights Reserved   |   Disclaimer   |   Sitemap

Site last updated: December 30, 1899 at