Home  |  News  |  Sitemap  |  Contact Us  |  Login
Advertise With Us
Latest Notification
  • banner1
  • banner2
  • banner3
  • banner4
  • banner5
  • banner6
  • banner7
banner11 banner22 banner33 banner44 banner45 banner46 banner47

 Case Digest


Back
Drugs and Cosmetics Act, 1940
Section 18 (a) (vi) r/w Rule 65 (17)—“Physician’s Sample not to be sold” for public sale
Section 18 (a) (vi) r/w Rule 65 (17)—“Physician’s Sample not to be sold” for public sale
The prosecution failed to establish the culpability of the accused beyond doubt - Acquittal of the offence under—appeal against—the accused kept in their possession seven brands of drugs, which were marked as “Physician’s Sample not to be sold” for public sale and thereby contravened the statutory provisions—the drugs were found from the business premises of the accused — the trial court concluded that the accused were carrying Agency of sale of medicines of various companies and they were simply acting as a Care Taker of those companies and the drugs in question belonged to the Medical Representatives – the prosecution failed to establish the culpability of the accused beyond doubt—acquittal order confirmed —appeal dismissed.
State of Haryana vs. Baldev Krishan Chawla and another, Punjab and Haryana High Court, Drugs Cases 2011(2) 16

Back


» Home
» Latest Notification
» New Drugs
» Import of Drugs
» Drug Prices
» Legislations
» Applications Forms
» Quackwatch
» Forms & Fees
» Licence Conditions
» Schedules
» Health, Pharma. Policies & Reports
» Ayurvedic
» Govt. Bodies
» Information Centre
» Directory
» Alert
» Regulatory News
» Research News
» News in Hindi
» Login
» Contact Us

Copyright © DrugsControl.org - Jaipur, INDIA. All Rights Reserved   |   Disclaimer   |   Sitemap

Site last updated: December 30, 1899 at