Home  |  News  |  Sitemap  |  Contact Us  |  Login
Advertise With Us
Latest Notification
  • banner1
  • banner2
  • banner3
  • banner4
  • banner5
  • banner6
  • banner7
banner11 banner22 banner33 banner44 banner45 banner46 banner47

 Case Digest


Back
Drugs and Cosmetics Act, 1940
Sections 27 (b) (i), 27 (c), 27 (d), 27 (b)(ii), 28-A and 22 (3)
Sections 27 (b) (i), 27 (c), 27 (d), 27 (b)(ii), 28-A and 22 (3)
Complaint filed without obtaining previous sanction of the competent authority - Conviction and sentence for commission of offences under— Section 33-M- cognizance of offence—the complainant visited the licensed sale premises of accused firm holding retail sale drug licence—sample of drug Cetriprim DS (Trimethoprim and Sulphamethoxazole Tablets IP) adulterated and Spurious—complaint filed— Complaint filed without obtaining previous sanction of the competent authority—discrepancy in the description of sample proved fatal to the prosecution case—impugned judgment/order of sentence passed by the trial Court set aside—acquittal.
Gursewak Dass and others vs. State of Haryana and another, Punjab & Haryana High Court, Drugs Cases 2011(2) 53

Back


» Home
» Latest Notification
» New Drugs
» Import of Drugs
» Drug Prices
» Legislations
» Applications Forms
» Quackwatch
» Forms & Fees
» Licence Conditions
» Schedules
» Health, Pharma. Policies & Reports
» Ayurvedic
» Govt. Bodies
» Information Centre
» Directory
» Alert
» Regulatory News
» Research News
» News in Hindi
» Login
» Contact Us

Copyright © DrugsControl.org - Jaipur, INDIA. All Rights Reserved   |   Disclaimer   |   Sitemap

Site last updated: December 30, 1899 at